問題詳情
Experience teaches us not to assume that the obvious is clearly understood. So it is with the truism with which webegin: all educational practice implies a theoretical stance on the educator’s part. This stance in turn implies—sometimesmore, sometimes less explicitly—an interpretation of man and the world. It could not be otherwise. The process of men’sorientation in the world involves not just the association of sense and images, as for animals. It involves, above all,thought-language; that is, the possibility of the act of knowing through his praxis, by which man transforms reality. Forman, this process of orientation in the world can be understood neither as a purely subjective event, nor as an objective ormechanistic one, but only as an event in which subjectivity and objectivity are united. Orientation in the world, sounderstood, places the question of the purposes of action at the level of critical perception of reality.If, for animals, orientation in the world means adaptation to the world, for man it means humanizing the world bytransforming it. For animals there is no historical sense, no options or values in their orientation in the world; for manthere is both a historical and a value dimension. Men have the sense of “project,” in contrast to the instinctive routines ofanimals.
【題組】43 Which of the following is NOT a contrast between men and animals mentioned in the passage?
(A)Subjectivity vs. objectivity
(B)Sense of history vs. lack of historical sense
(C)Men humanize the world while animals adapt to the world
(D)Action directed by language and thought vs. action directed by association of sense and images
參考答案
答案：A
難度：困難0.26087
統計：A(6),B(4),C(7),D(5),E(0)