問題詳情
IV. Reading (Questions 41-50): Choose the BEST answer for each question. Passage 1 Repeated reading is a pedagogy originally developed to improve first-language (L1) learners’reading deficiency problems, in particular issues related to reading fluency and comprehension. In atypical repeated reading session, students are led to attend to both the phonological and visualinformation of a text by listening to the oral reading of the teacher while the students arecomprehending the text. In repeated reading of the same text, unfamiliar vocabulary or grammaticalstructure is revisited in context. This listening-while-reading technique, according to the dual-modality input theories, can significantly enhance the depth of language learning and foster elaboratememory traces of unfamiliar language forms (such as sound and spelling). In addition, repeatedreading of the same text, according to Bill VanPatten’s input processing principle, could endowsecond language (L2) learners with an optimal processing environment for language forms.Specifically, Bill VanPatten stipulated that there exists a universal tendency for bilinguals to process(language) input mainly for meaning. However, if L2 learners only process language input formeaning without attending to language forms, they will never acquire any new words or novelgrammatical structures. VanPatten also noted that L2 learners may attend to unfamiliar or novellanguage forms, and acquire them if and only after they understand the message(s) that the formsencode. This sequential view of input processing account suggests that in initial reading of a text, itis extremely difficult for L2 learners to perform any form-based processing of new vocabulary orgrammar. This suggests that any one-shot pedagogical reading teaching practice cannot effectivelyserve as the fulcrum for promoting L2 acquisition; only later (in the following exposure to the sametext) are readers’ attentional resources freed up for analyzing unfamiliar or novel language forms incomprehensible contexts. The above account offers a possible theoretical foundation for repeatedreading. It is important to note that repeated reading pedagogy involves rereading the same text severaltimes and that such a repetitive exposure may dampen learners’ motivation to attend to the languageforms. Stephan Krashen (2004), a famous linguist, proposed that optimal form-based processing ofnovel vocabulary or grammar only occurs when learners are led to read several comprehensible textsrevolving around the same topic, and, ideally, texts constructed by the same author. In reading textsof the above nature, readers are led to familiarize themselves with the writing style and expression ofa given author while accumulating the background knowledge (meaning) of the topic at focus. Thus,in each subsequent reading, the readers’ background knowledge is enhanced; importantly, readers aregiven a contextually- and conceptually-constrained context to revisit the form and usage of unfamiliarvocabulary or grammar. Krashen coined the above approach “narrow reading”, which involves deepreading in a given topic. Narrow reading thus diverges from repeated reading in terms of ‘the context’in which the target vocabulary or structure is (re)visited: same passage vs. different but relatedpassages. Apparently, the major and clearest advantage of narrow reading is that it is, in comparisonwith repeated reading of the same text, potentially more motivating from the perspective of learners’reading experience. Krashen even goes so far as to claim that narrow reading—the combination ofcontextualized deep reading and guided phonological reading—really has a chance of leading learnersto go beyond “reading for meaning” and to further achieve “reading for learning.” Granted, whethernarrow input is unambiguously effective in all cases warrants further empirical validation. Ioptimistically believe that the positive effects of the narrow reading approach can be expected.
【題組】41. What is the best title for this passage?
(A) An Introduction to the Dual-modality Input Theory
(B) A Developmental Account of L2 Phonological Development
(C) A Review of Two Reading Pedagogical Practices
(D) A Linguistic Approach to L2 Motivation Enhancement
參考答案
答案:C
難度:適中0.583
書單:沒有書單,新增
用户評論
【培源吳】評論
中國釋疑申請釋疑者認為 41 題選項(C) A Review of Two Reading Pedagogical Practices 不是形容本文之最佳選項,也就是說,申請釋疑者覺得本篇文章不是 一個 review。A. 申請釋疑者觀點建構在他認為:本文僅針對一個文章中出現的字(introduce) 就認為本篇文章僅在“介紹”,“並沒有真正的評論”(上述皆是申請釋疑 者用字)。但是申請釋疑者卻又說在提及 narrow reading 時,作者有“表達 出作者的樂觀”。這個由申請釋疑者提出的例子,不就是一個評論與觀點?B. 申請釋疑者認為本篇文章“綜觀全篇,並沒有引經據典”。這邊要請申請釋 疑者注意,在談論 repeated reading 時,作者有引述 Bill VanPatten 的意 見,在談論 narrow reading 時,有述及 Stephan Krashen 這個著名語言學者 意見。上述引述/引論學者觀點,也是一般(文獻)回顧的常用 reference 方 式。C. Review 有“評論”與“(文獻)回顧”(literature review)的意思。如果 申請釋疑者去查(literature) review 的定義,會發現指的是: “a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic.” ,這邊 survey 的意思指的 就是(scholarly) introduction to a specific topic(對於某一議題/主題 之(學術)介紹)。在英國愛丁堡大學網站中也說明:literature review 是 作者展示某一主題的知識與了解之學術寫作(A literature review is a piece of academic writing demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the academic literature on a specific topic)。在這文章中,作者展 示了他對於兩種不同閱讀教學技巧之知識與評論,並且引述相關學者觀點, 說明了他對於這兩種技巧之評量/評論(evaluation)。這就是 review 的重要 意涵。D. 申請釋疑者更說:“一般 Review 也不能有太多的個人主觀看法吧 ?),申請釋疑者此觀點,與實務是不符合的,舉個簡單例子來說,電影評論(movie review)就是具有影評人個人觀點此類文體。書評(book review/critique)更是,要評論某事物,絕對會涉及相當程度之個人意見,絕非有 review 不能有 太多個人觀點。E. 更重要的是,申請釋疑者所提的(D) A Linguistic Approach to L2 Motivation Enhancement 才是正解,應該是申請釋疑者的誤讀,請注意 D 選項講的第二語言學習動機(L2 motivation),本篇雖有提到動機,但是那是依附在談論第二語言閱讀方法之下,且非本篇文章重點。F. 綜觀全文,皆在講 repeated reading 和 narrow reading 這兩種閱讀法。因 此,本題正確答案應無疑義。