問題詳情
請依下文回答第48題至第50題:
The interrelationship of science, technology, and industry is taken for granted today—summed up, not altogether accurately, commonly recognized as "research and development." Yet historically this widespread faith in the economic virtues of science is a somewhat recent phenomenon, dating back in the United States about 150 years, and in the Western world as a whole not over 300 years at most. Even in this current era of large scale, intensive research and development,the interrelationships involved in this process are often misunderstood. Until the coming of the Industrial Revolution,science and technology evolved for the most part independently of each other. Then as industrialization became more and more complicated, the craft techniques of pre-industrial society gradually gave way to a technology based on the systematic application of scientific knowledge and scientific methods. This changeover started slowly and progressed unevenly. Until late in the nineteenth century, only a few industries could afford to use scientific techniques or cared about using them.
Nevertheless, by the middle of the nineteenth century, the immense expansion of scientific knowledge and of public awareness of it had created a belief that the advance of science would in some unspecified manner automatically create economic benefits. The pervasive acceptance of this thesis led in turn to the assumption that the application of science to industrial purposes was a linear process, starting with fundamental science, then proceeding to applied science or technology, and through them to industrial use. This is probably the most general pattern, but it is not invariable. New areas of science have been opened up and fundamental discoveries made as a result of attempts to solve a specific technical or economic problem. On the contrary, scientists who mainly do basic research also serve as consultants on projects that apply research in practical ways. In sum, the science-technology-industry relationship may flow in several different ways, and the particular channel it will follow depends on the individual situation. It may at times even be multidirectional.
【題組】48 What is the author’s main purpose in the passage?
(A)To show how technology influenced basic science
(B)To describe the scientific base of nineteenth-century American industries
(C)To correct misunderstandings about the connections between science, technology, and industry
(D)To argue that basic science has no practical application
參考答案
答案:C
難度:適中0.584
書單:沒有書單,新增
用户評論
【墨夜熠樓】評論
文章裡有些單字都連在一起了~ 閱讀起來有點吃力 ~
【加賴叫過去】評論
看到題目在問文章大意的時候第一件事情就是...
【矮冬瓜】評論
今天,科學、技術和工業之間的相互關係被認爲是理所當然的——用"研究和發展"來概括,而不是完全準確。 然而,從歷史上看,這種普遍相信科學的經濟美德是一種新現象,可以追溯到150年前的美國,整個西方世界最多不超過300年。 即使在目前這個規模龐大、研發密集的時代,這個過程所涉及的相互關係也常被誤解。 在工業革命到來之前,科學技術在很大程度上相互獨立地發展。 隨着工業化日益複雜,前工業化社會的工藝技術逐漸被一種基於科學知識和科學方法的系統化應用技術所取代。 這種轉變起步緩慢,進展不均。 直到19世紀末,只有少數行業能夠負擔得起使用或關心使用科學技術。然而,到19世紀中葉,科學知識的大幅擴張以及公衆對科學知識的認知已經...
【josephine2002】評論
The interrelationship of science, technology, and industry is taken for granted today—summed up, not altogether accurately, commonly recognized as "research and development." Yet historically this widespread faith in the economic virtues of science is a somewhat recent phenomenon, dating back in the United States about 150 years, and in the Western world as a whole not over 300 years at most. Even in this current era of large scale, intensive research and development,the interrelationships involved in this process are often misunderstood. Until the coming of the Industrial Revolution,science ...
【Hazel小女巫】評論
interrelationship 相互關係taken for granted 理所當然Yet然而somewhat有些virtues 美德 價值evolved for進化為gradually逐漸changeover 轉變progressed 發展unevenly.不均勻immense巨大的unspecified 未指定The pervasive 無孔不入,蔓延的invariable不變的consultants顧問