問題詳情
A sanctuary may be defined as a place where Man is passive and the rest of Nature active. Till quite recently Nature had her own sanctuaries, where man either did not go at all or only as a tool-using animal in comparatively small numbers. But now, in this machinery age, there is no place left where man cannot go with overwhelming forces at his command. He can strangle to death all the nobler wild life in the world to-day. To-morrow he certainly will have done so, unless he exercises due foresight
and self-control in the mean time.
There is not the slightest doubt that birds and mammals are now being killed off much faster than they can breed. And it is always the largest and noblest forms of life that suffer most. The whales and elephants, lions and eagles, go. The rats and flies, and all mean parasites, remain, This is inevitable in certain cases. But it is wanton killing off that I am speaking of to-night. Civilized man begins by destroying the very forms of wild life he learns to appreciate most when he becomes still more civilized.
The obvious remedy is to begin conservation at an earlier stage, when it is easier and better in every way, by enforcing laws for close seasons, game preserves, the selective protection of certain species, and sanctuaries.
I have just defined a sanctuary as a place where man is passive and the rest of Nature active. But this general definition is too absolute for any special case. The mere fact that man has to protect a sanctuary does away with his purely passive attitude. Then, he can be beneficially active by destroying pests and parasites, like bot-flies or mosquitoes, and by finding antidotes for diseases like the epidemic which periodically kills off the rabbits and thus starves many of the carnivora to death. But, except
in cases where experiment has proved his intervention to be beneficial, the less he upsets the balance of Nature the better, even when he tries to be an earthly Providence.
【題組】48. The author implies that his first definition of a sanctuary is_______
(A) totally wrong
(B) somewhat idealistic
(C) unhelpful
(D) indefensible
(E) immutable
參考答案
答案:B
難度:適中0.54
書單:沒有書單,新增
用户評論
【Tiffany】評論
避難所可以定義為人類是被動的而自然的其餘部分是主動的地方。直到最近,大自然才有了自己的庇護所,人類要么根本不去,要么只是作為一種使用工具的動物,數量相對較少。但是現在,在這個機械時代,沒有任何地方是人類無法駕馭壓倒性力量的地方。他可以把當今世界上所有高貴的野生動物都掐死。明天他肯定會這樣做,除非他有應有的遠見和同時的自我控制。 毫無疑問,鳥類和哺乳動物現在被殺死的速度比它們繁殖的速度要快得多。遭受最大痛苦的總是最大和最高貴的生命形式。鯨魚和大象,獅子和鷹,都走了。老鼠和蒼蠅以及所有卑鄙的寄生蟲仍然存在,這在某些情況下是不可避免的。但我今晚說的是肆意殺戮。文明人首先要摧毀他在變得更加文明時學會最欣賞的野生動物。明顯的補救措施是在更早的階段開始保護,當它在各個方面都更容易和更好時,通過執行關於關閉季節、野生動物保護區、對某些物種和保護區的選擇性保護的法律。 我剛剛將避難所定義為一個人是被動的而自然的其餘部分是主動的地方。但是這個一般定義對於任何特殊情況來說都太絕對了。人類必須保護聖所這一事實消除了他純粹被動的態度。然後,他可以通過消滅害蟲和寄生蟲(如蠅蛆或蚊子)以及通過尋找流行病等疾病的解毒劑來進行有益的活動,這種疾病會周期性地殺死兔子,從而使許多食肉動物餓死。但是,除了在實驗證明他的干預是有益的情況下,他越少破壞自然的平衡越好,即使他試圖成為地球上的上帝。【題組】48.作者暗示他對避難所的第一個定義是_______(A) 完全錯誤(B) 有點理想主義(C) 無益的(D) 無可辯駁(E) 不可變的