問題詳情
35 The US Supreme Court rules that, barring circumstances like child abduction or a ticking time bomb, the FourthAmendment of the US Constitution requires police to get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest.This ruling makes our digital privacy no "less worthy of the protection for which the Founders of our nationfought."
(A) Under certain extreme conditions, the Fourth Amendment can be temporarily suspended.
(B) The Fourth Amendment is considered a ticking time bomb by the US Constitution.
(C) The police needs to get the authorities' approval to search any suspect's cell phone.
(D) The founders of the USA also fought for their digital privacy.
參考答案
答案：A
難度：困難0.30888
統計：A(80),B(33),C(112),D(34),E(0)
用户評論
【waterbear】評論
翻譯有點爛，湊合著參考吧：美國最高法院裁定：除非像誘拐兒童或定時炸彈的情況，憲法第四修正案要求警察逮捕(犯人)後，要檢查手機之前需得到搜查令(才能進行檢查)。
【我愛阿，阿愛我】評論
US Supreme Court：美國最高法院barring：除……以外abduction：綁架amendment：修正constitution：憲法warrant：授權ruling：規定(A)suspend：中止
【“勞謙君子，有終吉”】評論
美國最高法院裁定，除了綁架兒童或定時炸彈等情況外，美國憲法第四修正案要求警察在逮捕後檢查手機之前獲得手令。這項裁決使我們的數位隱私“不值得我們國家創始人為之奮鬥的保護”。（A）在某些極端情況下，第四修正案可以暫時中止。（B）第四修正案被美國憲法視為定時炸彈。（C）警方需要獲得當局的批准才能搜查任何嫌疑人的手機。（D）美國的創始人也為數字隱私而戰。