問題詳情

IV. Discourse      Teaching students about the Russian invasion of Ukraine is not as easy as you might expect. The war has been fast-moving, heartbreaking, and difficult to process. Not only that,   16   Even so, Professor Jay and Professor Buterbaugh of the Political Science Department at Southern Connecticut State University offer some advice on teaching about the Russia–Ukraine war more effectively.
    Their first suggestion is for educators to approach the Ukraine war as learners. Teachers do not necessarily have to be scholars or researchers of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to effectively teach it. Instead, they should frame themselves as learners who utilize their experiences of being learners transparently and as a form of modeling. Gradually,   17  
    Another suggestion is that   18   As an instructor, it can also be an appropriate approach to guide students to explore media literacy and critical thinking by encouraging students to analyze statements from both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The students can see the value in being skeptical of both nations’ accounts. This is a good case study to teach not merely critical thinking, but also how to examine valid evidence.
    In addition to the aforementioned ideas, Jay and Buterbaugh also remind us to be on the alert for any sign of misinterpretation or misinformation when it comes to assisting students in making sense of the war. For one, we are expected to use analogies, although it is imperative to not oversimply complex issues. Comparing this war to other events in our history curriculum can be a powerful teaching tool. This type of approach can deepen students’ knowledge of both events. Yet,   19   Another teaching pedagogy we ought to beware of is that when teaching about the war in Ukraine, educators should make sure to differentiate between Russian leadership and the general populace. A great number of nations have clearly sided with Ukraine. Over time,   20   Consequently, instructors should supervise discussions to step in before students start demonizing Russians.
    In brief, addressing the Russian invasion of Ukraine is an opportunity for learning and discussion on a number of topics in class. Nevertheless, there are some do’s and don’ts we as educators should take into consideration.

(A) Russia and Ukraine’s competing narratives should be closely scrutinized.

(B) that is likely to trigger anti-Russian sentiment, causing students to stereotype all Russians as invaders, and treat all Russians as culpable.

(C) we should be careful to teach students not to generalize the comparisons of all historic events; otherwise, their bias or prejudice may come into play.

(D) numerous educators lack sufficient knowledge about the complicated geopolitical and historical background to the conflict.

(E) with this mindset, they can realize that their goal as teachers is not to impart knowledge about the conflict, but to facilitate students’ inquiry as they learn more about it.
【題組】16.

參考答案

答案:D
難度:適中0.55
書單:沒有書單,新增

用户評論

應屆上岸~台北台中台南都正】評論

向學生傳授俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭的知識並不像您想像的那麼容易。戰爭進展迅速,令人心碎,難以處理。不僅如此,___16___。即便如此,(南康涅狄格州立大學)政治學系的傑伊教授和巴特博教授就提供了一些建議在"更有效的教授俄烏戰爭"這件事上。(A) 應仔細審查俄羅斯和烏克蘭的相互競爭的敘述。(B) 這可能會引發反俄情緒,導致學生將所有俄羅斯人定型為侵略者,並將所有俄羅斯人視為有罪。(C) 我們應該小心地教導學生不要將所有歷史事件的比較一概而論;否則,他們的偏見或偏見可能會發揮作用。(D) 許多教育工作者對沖突的複雜地緣政治和歷史背景缺乏足夠的了解。(E) 有了這種心態,他們可以意識到他們作為教師的目標不是傳授有關衝突的知識,而是在學生了解更多衝突時促進他們的探究。結合上下文,(D)最能符合