問題詳情

第 16 題至 20 題為題組
        Had the 1,300-foot Ever Given not run aground in the Suez Canal on March 23, global trade__16.__ by the blockage that lasted for almost a week. Since the ship was dislodged on March 29,investigators __17.__ data from the ship’s voyage data recorder for more clues to how the vesselended up lodged in the bank of the canal. People __18.__ in the investigation say that the probefocuses on a sandstorm that was taking place when the ship ran aground and a two-minute gust ofwind that likely threw the vessel off course.
       Meanwhile, according to the Suez Canal Authority, not until investigations are complete andcompensation is paid __19.__ Ever Given. They also say that they won’t rule out a lawsuit, but preferto __20.__ the matter outside of court with reportedly one billion dollars in compensation
【題組】16.
(A) were obstructed
(B) had been impeded
(C) would not be discontinued
(D) would not have been disrupted

參考答案

答案:D
難度:適中0.556
書單:沒有書單,新增

用户評論

【用戶】shouhuiliu

【年級】高二下

【評論內容】Had the 1,300-foot E☆☆☆ ☆☆☆☆☆ ...

【用戶】Kelly Yu

【年級】國三上

【評論內容】翻: 如果1300英尺長的長賜輪(一艘2018年啟用的超級貨櫃船)沒有在3月23日在蘇伊士運河擱淺,全球貿易就不會因為持續近一周的封鎖而中斷。

【用戶】陳宥蓉

【年級】小五上

【評論內容】Had the 1,300-foot Ever Given not run aground.., global trade would not have been disrupted... 此為對過去事實的假設= If the Ever Given had not run aground.., global trade would not have been disrupted...If + S + had p.p. , S + would/could/should + have + p.p.