問題詳情

請依下文回答第 16 題至第 20 題        The incredible thing about television is that characters have the potential to be represented in a milliondifferent ways. Unfortunately, producers tend to stick to the same few archetypes and tropes. Nearly everyshow about high schoolers includes a tough jock or a rebellious bad boy. As such, it is no surprise that televisionfollows a few patterns and stereotypes when it comes to portraying intelligence.       One of the most obvious and frankly painful depictions of intelligence is the socially awkward genius. Inspite of their high IQs and brilliant minds, these characters have trouble understanding jokes and other socialcues. For instance, nearly every character in “The Big Bang Theory” acts this way. Most of the show’s humorcomes from the contrast between the awkwardness of the brilliant physicists like Sheldon and Leonard, andthe “normal” people like Penny, the waitress who lives across the hall. Another kind of intelligent character isthe one whose abilities are limited to helping the protagonist. We thus can see that in the show “Arrow,” FelicitySmoak is a computer whiz who worked as an IT girl for superhero Oliver Queen’s company before joining“Team Arrow” as a hacker. She could do anything from finding shortcuts during a car chase to sending a greedycriminal’s illegally-earned income to a charity as a twisted form of blackmail—all from the comfort of her computer screen. However, when she wasn’t busy saving the world, she was reduced to little more than OliverQueen’s love interest. The final type of smart character is the one that is constantly picked on. In a high schoolscenario, it’s the nerdy kid who gets shoved into lockers and made fun of. The show “Glee” created an entireseries based on this idea. Even after the glee club won awards and competitions, it was still met with resentmentfrom the majority of the student body. Although the audience wanted the students in the glee club to succeed,the prevailing theme throughout the show was that the kids who were smart and hard-working were not theones who were cool and popular.        The fact is, smart people aren’t as unique as television makes them out to be. They should not be marveledat like zoo animals or be used as an easy target. Additionally, the characters who are presented in the mediashouldn’t have their intelligence be their defining characteristic. Although television has come a long way innormalizing intelligence, there is still more ground to be gained in creating characters that are complex andinteresting—not just smart.
【題組】16 Which of the following patterns of organization does the author most likely use when developing thispassage?
(A) Simple listing.
(B) Cause and effect.
(C) Comparison and contrast.
(D) Generalization and example.

參考答案

用户評論

Karen】評論

16 Which of the following patterns of organization does the author most likely use when developing this passage?作者在撰寫這篇文章時最有可能使用以下哪種組織模式?(A) Simple listing.    簡單列表。(B) Cause and effect.  因果關係。(C) Comparison and contrast.   比較和對比。(D) Generalization and example.    概括和示例。譯文:電視的神奇之處在於,角色有可能以百萬種不同的方式呈現出來。不幸的是,制作人傾向於堅持相同的少數原型和比喻。幾乎每一個關於高中生的節目都會有一個強硬的運動員或者一個叛逆的壞男孩。因此,在描述智力時,電視遵循一些模式和刻板印象就不足為奇了。對智力最明顯也是最痛苦的描述之一就是不善社交的天才。儘管他們的智商很高,頭腦也很聰明,但這些角色在理解笑話和其他社交暗示方面有困難。例如,《生活大爆炸》中幾乎每個角色都是這樣的。這部劇的大部分幽默來自於像謝爾頓和萊納德這樣傑出的物理學家和像住在對門的女服務員佩妮這樣的普通人之間的尷尬對比。另一種聰明的角色是能力僅限於幫助主角的角色。 由此我們可以看出,在節目《綠箭俠》中,Felicity Smoak 是一位電腦高手,在加入《綠箭俠隊》擔任黑客之前,她曾在超級英雄奧利弗·奎因 (Oliver Queen) 的公司擔任 IT 女孩。她可以做任何事情,從在汽車追逐中尋找捷徑到將貪婪的犯罪分子的非法收入作為一種扭曲的勒索形式發送給慈善機構——一切都在她舒適的電腦屏幕上完成。然而,當她不忙於拯救世界時,她就淪為奧利弗·奎恩 (Oliver Queen) 的戀人而已。 最後一種類型的智能角色是不斷被選中的角色。 在高中場景中,是一個被推到儲物櫃並被取笑的書呆孩子。節目“歡樂合唱團”基於這個想法創造了一個完整的系列。 即使在合唱團獲得獎項和比賽之後,它仍然遭到了大多數學生團體的不滿。 雖然觀眾希望歡樂合唱團的學生們取得成功,但整個節目的主導主題是聰明勤奮的孩子不是酷和受歡迎的孩子。事實是,聰明人並不像電視所描述的那樣獨特。 他們不應該像動物園裡的動物一樣被驚嘆,也不應該被用作容易攻擊的目標。 此外,媒體中出現的角色不應該將他們的智力作為他們的定義特徵。 儘管電視在使智力正常化方面取得了長足的進步,但在創造複雜而有趣的角色——不僅僅是聰明的角色方面,還有更多的基礎。