問題詳情
When we discuss contrasting economic systems and principles, we often compare socialism with capitalism. In a capitalistic economy, most businesses are privately owned. Both owners and workers are motivated by profit. In early capitalist countries, the government had little control over private business affairs. This led to problems regarding workplace safety, worker pay, and the environment. In modern capitalist countries, government regulations put many restrictions on business owners.Capitalist economies have traditionally created major class divisions between the rich and the poor. Socialism aims to eliminate these divisions, although no socialist state has been entirely successful in reaching this goal. In a socialist economy, ownership of capital and distribution of wealth are managed by a centralized government. This is a difficult task because of the sheer amount of work involved in managing an entire economic machine. If a government can provide each citizen with basic necessities, it has achieved its most fundamental task.
【題組】42 What is this passage mainly about?
(A) The dangers of capitalist systems and free markets.
(B) The comparison between two dominant economic systems.
(C) The efficiency of the government to run an entire economic system.
(D) The government’s law to regulate business owners.
參考答案
答案：B
難度：適中0.690832
統計：A(22),B(324),C(70),D(24),E(0) #
個人：尚未作答書單：片語、九十九年地方政府特種考試試題、between & among 之用法
用户評論
【Chun Jen Wan】評論
當我們討論經濟制度和原則的對比，我們往往比較社會主義與資本主義。在資本主義經濟中，大多數企業都是私人擁有。業主和工人受利益驅使。在早期資本主義國家，政府對私人商業事務幾乎無法控制。這導致了關於工作場所安全，工人的工資，和環境的問題。在現代資本主義國家，政府法規把企業業主的諸多限制。傳統的資本主義經濟，富國和窮國之間的主要階級劃分。社會主義的目的是消除這些分歧，雖然沒有社會主義國家在實現這一目標已經完全成功。在社會主義市場經濟中，資本和財富分配的所有權是由一個集中的政府管理。這是一個艱鉅的任務，因為純粹的涉案金額在整個經濟機器管理工作。如果政府能提供與每個公民的基本必需品，它已達到其最根本的任務。
【林裕傑】評論
principle 原則I take this seriously. It's a matter of principle. 我對此很認真。這是原則問題。