問題詳情
68 In Palko v. Connecticut, the petitioner argued that the Fourteenth Amendment__________ , as against the States,the Fifth Amendment requirement that no person “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardyof life or limb.” The Court disagreed, holding that federal double jeopardy standards were not applicableagainst the States.
(A) inserted
(B) incorporated
(C) declared
(D) enumerated
參考答案
答案：B
難度：困難0.2
書單：沒有書單，新增
用户評論